|
|
|
The foot is so much better - went out for an evening
stroll last night, hardly limping at all. On El Camino,
a running man passed me - he was futuristic, yet quite
contemporary. His build said "Native American" to me,
an impression augmented by his swinging ponytail. In the
small of his back a ruby warning light pulsed - slowly,
like his heartbeat (unlike the rapid strobing of my own
red light I wear during night bike rides). It was
visible for some distance, as he jogged away to the
north. I think I'll be ready for the treadmill by Sunday.
Merged my code this morning, just under the wire, proving
once again that old adage about software development, how
the time it takes expands to fill the schedule allotted to
it. Afterwards, checking it out, the Big Fear when my usual
test file didn't work. Tried with the small files I'd
made, which contained individual flights, they were okay.
Then I connected up with our live data feed from DFW, actually
the first valid test, and things seemed okay again, so I
concluded that some new addition elsewhere in the applications
isn't agreeing with my test file format. (Worked fine up until
yesterday, though.) Our system focuses on arriving aircraft;
but I fixed one of the few features involving departures: I've
been changing flights' times, usually delaying them - but not
really, only the actual controllers' workstations have the
connections necessary to do that.
Became acquainted with another voice of reason
at lunch, in an interview in the radio - Richard
Grossman ("The Program on Corporations,
Law & Democracy") - he says we went wrong with that
big decision made in 1886 about how corporations
had individual rights, even before women or people of
color were given the right to vote.
This is a good introductory
essay.
From an article in the end-of-year "New Yorker,"
the "fiction" issue, where George W. S. Trow deconstructs
"The New York Times," now and in comparison with the
February 1, 1950 issue:
While I was learning to read the papers, television - an
ignorant little snippet of a medium - was in the wings.
It had no real standing in February, 1950, but of all
our cultural avatars I encountered in New York as a boy
it was what was going to be left standing. Looking back
at the Times of 1950, I wonder if our current
culture of irony and anger and freneticism - our TV
culture - doesn't have its essential qualities because
the culture as a whole in America in 1950 felt in its
bones a contradiction. Having just climbed the pinnacle,
stretching our cultural fabric to the limit along the
way, we were condemned by the nature of the
moment - technology interacting with our fundamental
war-weariness and our need for distraction - to
embrace a foolish child's reaction to a world
situation that demanded a mind more remarkably
adult than any of us had in fact achieved.
My view of the civilization as it was presented in
the Times of February, 1950, is that in the
Second World War the Germans lost and television won.
Personally, I've never taken to the "New York Times."
I rarely select it if there's a choice. Although I
disagree with a lot of its agenda, and find it tragically
undignified the way the use puns in headlines now,
I still retain some loyalty to my first employer,
"The Washington Post" (and look
forward to the day when "Herblock" retires).
|
|